|
|||
|
Dallas Real Estate Investors Limit Risk with Cost Segregation Dallas Real estate investors are initially shocked when they learn they can cut their tax rate by over half and defer paying the income taxes as a result of cost segregation. Real estate investors have an intuitive feeling and belief that their tax return preparers are searching for every possible option to reduce their federal income taxes. They place a high level of trust in their tax return preparer and believe their tax professional seeks all available legitimate methods to reduce federal income taxes. After the shock wears off, real estate investors sometimes ask if cost segregation is a risky tax shelter. Cost segregation is an IRS-guided technique to correctly allocate the cost basis of real estate to both short-life and long-life components. Obtaining a cost segregation study from a qualified appraiser provides real estate investors a safe harbor for increasing real estate depreciation. Many high net worth real estate investors have had bad experiences with tax shelters. During the 1980s, many ill-conceived investments were structured primarily to provide tax benefits. The investments were not based upon a sound economic structure. While a high level of skepticism is appropriate when considering issues related to federal income taxes, a detailed review of the income tax code and IRS documentation will show cost segregation to be both legitimate and effective. Most tax professionals are aware of cost segregation and believe it is a legitimate and appropriate technique. However, few tax return preparers are technically proficient in compiling a cost segregation study. Many real estate investors are familiar with component depreciation. Component depreciation focused on allocating a shorter depreciation life to portions of the building structure and systems. These often included the roof, elevators, electrical system, plumbing and the HVAC system. Although the technical mechanics of cost segregation differ substantially from the technical process of component depreciation, the end result for both is a higher level of depreciation. Component depreciation was used until the early 1980s to sharply increase the level of real estate depreciation. There were some concerns of abuse by the IRS. In the early 1980s, the option of using component depreciation was eliminated but much more generous depreciation schedules were substituted. These generous real estate depreciation schedules were eliminated in 1986. There was no safe harbor for increasing depreciation beyond what was allowed in the tax tables from 1981 through 1996. The HCA (Hospital Corporation of America) case was determined in favor of HCA in 1996. When the IRS decided not to appeal the case, a new option to increase real estate depreciation became available; it is termed cost segregation. From 1996 through 2000, cost segregation was available on a very limited basis. It was mostly limited to clients of the big-four accounting firms and specialty boutique firms. Most cost segregation reports initially cost $20,000 to $50,000. The high level of fees initially charged for cost segregation made it financially feasible only for buildings with a cost basis of at least $10,000,000-$20,000,000. While the methodology of cost segregation is different from that for component depreciation, the end result is similar - a higher level of depreciation for real estate investors. The IRS codified rules for cost segregation in its Audit Techniques Guide (ATG), apparently to provide both its officers and practitioners with clear guidelines. This provides real estate investors a safe harbor provided they use real estate appraisers who understand the ATG and prepare cost segregation reports consistent with the standards delineated in the ATG. The ATG provides clear and effective guidance for preparing a cost segregation report. A properly prepared cost segregation study prepared by a trained and experienced appraiser has a low level of risk. The Audit Techniques Guide provides guidance for material issues encountered on a routine basis. There is risk associated with using a report prepared by an individual who is either not well trained or who ignores the rules and segregates inappropriate items. There is some risk any depreciation schedule will be challenged in an audit. A high quality cost segregation report is the best documentation to support a real estate depreciation schedule. Real estate investors can catch-up depreciation previously under-reported after obtaining a cost segregation report. Few real estate investors and tax preparers are aware of the substantial benefit. It does not require filing amended tax returns for prior years. It is not unusual for the year-one depreciation to exceed $1 million as a result of preparing a cost segregation study and catching-up previously under-reported depreciation. Click here for a FREE preliminary analysis of tax savings resulting from your property. Cost segregation produces tax deductions and reduces federal income taxes for real estate owners across the country and in every size market. Below are just a few examples of where cost segregation generates meaningful tax deductions. City:
Property Type:
Industry:
Links & Resources | |